Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gina's avatar

I’m not through with the book yet, and while I do like parts of it, to be frank, so far, as with regards to the Christian case for effective altruism, I’m not persuaded, at best, and in some cases, at worst, I find it spiritually troubling. Parts of chapter 5 (which is most recent and top of mind) are a spiritual minefield man. And I’ve looked ahead and seen that there appears to be a section on the good of power and influence in this Christian book and I’m like (*nervous laughter*): oh man.

Emmett McDow's avatar

I remember being a teenager in my (Baptist) church, and asking the pastor why community aid was contingent upon church attendance/membership. They made the case that it was to prevent people from taking advantage of the programs. That didn’t sit well with me. It struck me as transactional and unnecessarily limited the scope of the aid.

As an adult, looking back, I can understand the need to protect systems of aid from those that might abuse them. But is making aid contingent upon church attendance the right way to do it? Or is it better to distribute aid unconditionally and accept some level of fraud(“forgive seven times seventy” etc)? I’m not sure.

In any case, sounds like that book might address issues like that. I certainly will check it out. Great post Luke!

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?